Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Hawker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:51, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Hawker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unconvinced that the subject meets notability requirements. Only one close-to-usable source (PR Weekly) in article. Certainly massively undersourced for a BLP. Article creator also appears to have COI (though I'm not advancing that as a reason for deletion). Yunshui 雲‍水 14:31, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable. Fails WP:BIO --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:37, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A man who has had some jobs but no evidence of individual notability to criteria here . AllyD (talk) 22:00, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:39, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It has not been properly covered, in depth, in reliable sources. — ΛΧΣ21™ 00:07, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.